[ATM] How dark is dark?
Jack Swaton @ Starry Host
jswaton at starryhost.com
Wed Sep 27 00:51:04 JST 2006
Suppose you had a priceless OTA that Galileo himself built and only one
chance to paint it. The interior is very rough (since the wood of this
priceless OTA is made from Swedish engineered birch flooring and the
backside is rough cut). Would you have enough faith in the evidence to paint
it glossy?
Jack Galileo Swaton
;-)
-----Original Message-----
From: atm-bounces at atmlist.net [mailto:atm-bounces at atmlist.net] On Behalf Of
Nils Olof Carlin
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 5:40 AM
To: cnc at cncservo.co.uk; atm at atmlist.net
Subject: Re: [ATM] How dark is dark?
Richard makes some rather remarkable statements:
>
> JSSH> What say you...matte or glossy?
>
> Don't be silly - matt of course.
>
>
> h> MatteWILL reflect more light.
>
> Where is the eveidence?
>
>h> It will just be more scattered.
>
> Yes. That is a good thing.
Makes me wonder - What has silliness to do with it?
And IIRC Ken presented the evidence. If you still doubt, any of you
can try one half each of the tube and see for yourself. And why would
more scattered be good? I wouldn't think more scattered into the EP (or
CCD) would be better.
Then again, the original question could perhaps be re-formulated. What
to do to minimize unwanted light entering the detector via the OTA?
perhaps.
N O
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/
More information about the ATM
mailing list