[ATM] Phase contrast and the 10 incher.
Stephen Koehler
s.c.koehler at gmail.com
Thu Apr 26 06:04:12 JST 2007
Arjan,
> Based on the clarity of the wormtracks all over the mirror in the foucault
> image, I would say they have to be multiple wave faults, if they were
> surface features. Such deviations would surely show up in the raw
> interferogram, but all I can see is low frequency abberation, and only to
> the right edge there's a hint of phase shift.
I disagree. The overall "donut" from testing at COC is about one
wave of error. These worm tracks are much more subtle. I ran a quick
simulation where I took a perfect wavefront, and lowered a rectangle
of the surface (about the size of one of the worm tracks) by 1/100
wave. It was easily visible in a simulated Foucault image, and at
about the same intensity as in Dale's Foucault image. This size of
defect would not be visible as perceptible bending in the
interferogram fringes.
--
Steve Koehler
More information about the ATM
mailing list