[ATM] perfect foucault results
Jim Burrows
burrjaw at earthlink.net
Sat Mar 22 13:47:29 JST 2008
At 2008-03-21 19:14 -0500, Paul Foreman wrote:
>I plugged in the numbers r (squared) /2R
>into Tex, Foucault, and Foucault Test Analysis 2.0B and the mirror comes
>out as worse than 1/2 wave.
It's part of the usual conundrum, wavefront or surface, ROC or focal
length, etc. - in this case it's probably fixed vs. moving
source. As I recall, Tex assumes fixed source and you have to double
your moving source measurements (for an exact representation, you
have to use a slightly different algorithm). Also as I recall,
sqr(r)/2R is moving source for a parabola.
-- Jim Burrows
-- http://home.earthlink.net/~burrjaw
-- mailto:burrjaw at earthlink.net
-- Seattle N47.4723 W122.3662 (WGS84)
More information about the ATM
mailing list