[ATM] Fixing edge zones
Mel Bartels
mbartels at bbastrodesigns.com
Fri Oct 9 10:21:09 JST 2009
I consider this good advice because often, in the end, you get to the
finished figure quicker if you start with a spherical smooth beginning.
Going back to spherical is always good advice because you can't go wrong
with this approach. Continuing to fix a figure with major problems can be a
black hole that will suck your enthusiasm across the event horizon!
Mel Bartels
-----Original Message-----
From: atm-bounces at atmlist.net [mailto:atm-bounces at atmlist.net] On Behalf Of
Mike Coslo
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 6:09 PM
To: atm at atmlist.net
Subject: Re: [ATM] Fixing edge zones
> I'm in the final stages of figuring my first 8" mirror. I first over shot
> the parabola by quite a bit, but with some help from the experts, I was
able
> to get close to a parabola using COC strokes. Using figureXP, my
wavefront
> error is about 1/3 wavelength. I need to increase the ROC of zones 3 and
4
> (I'm using a 4 zone mask). My question is what type of stroke do you
> recommend using to knock these zones down? Any help would be awesome!
This is non-standard advice, but you may want to go back to a sphere,
and then take it to a parabola. Occasionally a mirror can be overworked.
- Mike -
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/
More information about the ATM
mailing list