[ATM] WG: Focault (sic!) Help

Kerry Koppert kkoppert at slingshot.co.nz
Thu May 27 10:07:28 JST 2010


The URL for the pdf file is folded over two lines, copy and paste into a 
wordprocessing document and remove the line break (or reply to the email and 
remove the linebreak in the reply, copy and paste into browser).

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "vladimir sacek" <vla at copper.net>
To: <atm at atmlist.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:59 AM
Subject: Re: [ATM] WG: Focault (sic!) Help


No, the PDF wouldn't open up. Since the higher
order astigmatism is negligible, the RMS can be
obtained from the Zernike coefficient as well
(I assume it is z4, thus RMS=z4/sq.rt.6); it
should be nearly identical to the one obtained from
the p-v error.

Vla

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Berthold Hamburger" <b-hamburger at artinso.com>
To: "'vladimir sacek'" <vla at copper.net>
Cc: <atm at atmlist.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 9:01 AM
Subject: RE: [ATM] WG: Focault (sic!) Help


Vladimir,

Did you check the data on the document I uploaded?

Berthold

-- 
Berthold Hamburger - Cellist/Spain
Email: behambu at artinso.com
http://www.artinso.com
http://www.astro.artinso.com

-----Original Message-----
From: atm-bounces at atmlist.net [mailto:atm-bounces at atmlist.net] On Behalf Of
vladimir sacek
Sent: miércoles, 26 de mayo de 2010 14:43
To: atm at atmlist.net
Subject: Re: [ATM] WG: Focault (sic!) Help

Berthold Hamburger wrote:

>It is also interesting to observe the Strehl ratio for the isolated
>astigmatism analysis.
>Even the 1/10 wave astig remaining in the mirror currently will reduce
>Strehl ratio to 0.8.

Something is not right with that calculation. There is a constant
relationship between the p-v and RMS error for primary astigmatism,
RMS=(p-v)/(sq.rt.24). With 1/10 wave surface error doubled in the
wavefront, the RMS is still only 0.041, for 0.93+ Strehl.

Vla
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 5146 (20100526) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 5146 (20100526) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com



_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/



More information about the ATM mailing list